Speaking Out Against TARP
In 2006, when the subprime lending market began to implode, it sent shockwaves throughout the U.S. economy and eventually lead to a global economic decline. The effects of this financial catastrophe are still being felt today. In an attempt to bolster the economy and promote lending, even in the face of this disaster, the U.S. government created the Troubled Asset Relief Program to supply lenders with needed funding. “The point of TARP”, says Kristy Sinsara, President of the Consumer Advocacy Group, “was to ’stimulate the economy’ by giving money to ‘big businesses’.” But has the Troubled Asset Relief Program succeeded in its aim?
Many groups such as the Consumer Advocacy group, represented by Kristy Sinsara, say that TARP has failed in its objective. “We believe that the lenders have proven that they can NOT be trusted with the Troubled Asset Relief Funds set aside by the Obama Administration,” says Kristy Sinsara.
Kristy Sinsara and the Consumer Advocacy Group have spoken out against TARP, claiming that lenders such as Bank of America have demonstrated an unwillingness to use TARP funding as it was intended. “The lenders (Bank of America especially) have proven that they will only use the money for their own personal gain and have absolutely no individual homeowners’ needs in mind,” says Kristy Sinsara. “These lenders have essentially been given a blank check by our government that we as tax payers must pay for.”
If this funding has not been used to the benefit of suffering homeowners, how has it been used? Kirsty Sinsara and the Consumer Advocacy Group claim that TARP funds have been used to retain stability within the financial community at the expense of homeowners and taxpayers. These financial entities, says Kristy Sinsara, are using TARP funding to bail out or buy up crumbling financiers such as Meryl Lynch and Countrywide, rather than to benefit individual homeowners.
To sharpen the blow further, many of the executives of these failed institutions are receiving sizable bonuses or severance packages. These are the much discussed “golden parachutes” being handed out to the very individuals who’s poor decision making created this global economic crisis in the first place. It is this gross misuse of taxpayer money that has caused concerned groups like Kristy Sinsara and the Consumer Advocacy Group to stand up and voice their disproval.
Not only are these flagging financiers being bailed out, but many of the executives of these collapsed institutions are being provided with substantial exiting packages. These much discussed “golden parachutes” are being provided at taxpayer expense via TARP funds, says Kristy Sinsara. Meanwhile, organizations like the Consumer Advocacy Group are left scrambling to try to help faltering homeowners as best they can.
It is because of this seeming misuse of TARP funding that Kristy Sinsara’s Consumer Advocacy Group and other similar organizations are beginning to speak out. These homeowners advocates are lobbying in Washington in the hope of changing the Troubled Asset Relief Program so that relief is felt by those who truly need it most, the distressed homeowners.
Find out more information about Kristy Sinsara and the Consumer Advocacy Group.
The boring stuff – This article is user submitted and does not reflect the views of this website. This article is educational only and should not be taken as financial advice. To learn more about this topic, please follow the links provided by author the in the article. Links that introduce interesting products to you should be considered advertisements. Some of these links may be of a commercial nature and clicking on them may generate a financial benefit to this website.
Some interesting stuff -
1. A credit repair Book.
2. Start an eBay business.
3. Trading the FX market.
4. A penny stock list.
Related posts:
Leave your response!